Apogee Quartet Vs RME UCX

Looking for a new audio interface to work with in your home studio? There are two popular choices available in the same price range now, Apogee Quartet and RME UCX. There are different pros and cons for each of the two models. Apogee Quartet is loved by many because of the excellent preamp and sound quality. On the other hand, RME UCX is praised for the abundance of input and output channels and superior sound clarity. See the details on Apogee Quartet vs RME UCX below.

Apogee Quartet Vs RME UCX

Platform Compatibility
The first difference between Apogee Quartet and RME UCX that people should not forget is regarding the platform compatibility. Apogee Quartet can only work with Mac and iPad, as it works exclusively with these devices. It is not compatible with other platforms such as Windows and Linux distributions. So, this model is a viable choice only if you will only work with Mac or iPad. (See also : Apogee Quartet Vs Duet)

On the other hand, RME UCX has the ability to work with all major platforms. It works with Mac, Windows, and Linux distributions. So, this is the way to go if you need the versatility to work with different platforms easily.

Input and Output
The next difference between Apogee Quartet vs RME UCX is the input and output ports and channels. Of course, you need to make sure that the model you choose has the all the connectors and the number of channels that you need. You may also need to consider having some extra ports for backup.

Apogee Quartet comes with four analog mic/instrument inputs with built-in mic preamps and selectable +48V phantom power. There are also two TOSLINK digital inputs with a total of eight input channels. For output, there are six balanced line outs and an independent ¼” stereo headphone out. This model supports MIDI I/O via a USB Type-A connection.

On the other hand, RME UCX boasts numerous input and output channels. It has 18 input channels and 18 output channels for the best flexibility in any studio environment. On the front, you can find two XLR/TRS combo inputs, two TRS inputs, and two stereo TRS outs. On the rear, there are four more TRS inputs, six TRS outs, one SPDIF I/O, one ADAT/SPDIF I/O, and two MIDI I/O ports via a breakout cable.

Sound Quality
Finally, how about the sound quality of these two audio interface devices? Generally speaking, they two have excellent sound quality. They both support 24-bit/192kHz audio conversion for the best results. But they do have different characters.

The sound of Apogee Quartet tends to be louder and richer. As a result, the output tends to be more enjoyable to listen to without requiring further equalization. However, the richness and fullness may sometimes muddle up the mids and highs.

On the other hand, RME UCX has better clarity and accuracy. Due to the high levels of clarity and accuracy, it may sound a little bit too dry and analytical. However, it captures and reproduces the finest details very well. You can adjust the equalization to make it sound nicer.

Apogee Quartet Vs RME UCX

Apogee QuartetRME UCX
Key features- First professional multi-channel audio with direct digital connection to iPod touch, iPhone, iPad - USB 2.0 audio with 24-bit/192kHz A/D and D/A conversion Low latency monitoring, complete input/output control with - Apogee's Maestro software (iOS and Mac)- The Fireface UCX is a highly integrated pro audio solution in an ultra-compact format for studio and live recordings - Equipped with a new 2011 A/D and D/A high-performance converter design all I/Os operate at up to 192 kHz

Customer ratings*3.9 out of 5.0 stars4.8 out of 5.0 stars
Best deal*Save Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

NOTE : Product prices, availability, ratings and save money information are accurate as of the date/time indicated on post time (as seen right bellow the tittle) and are subject to change. Any price, ratings, availability and save money information displayed on Amazon Site at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

In general, RME UCX is more recommended. This model has better versatility and flexibility. It can work with Mac, Windows, and Linux distributions, and it has numerous I/O channels and ports. The output has excellent clarity and accuracy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *