Steinberg is easily one of the best brands of audio interface models available on the market right now. Steinberg models are well-known for their top-notch performance, quality, and especially durability. Now, if any of your is currently looking to upgrade your equipment to an advanced audio interface, make sure to take a look at Steinberg UR824 and Steinberg MR816. Available in a roughly similar price range, these are popular advanced models with superior features. So, which is the one that you should choose?
Number of Channels and Features
Obviously, one of the biggest differences between Steinberg UR824 and Steinberg MR816 is the number of channels available. In addition, they also come with slightly differing features.
As you may have guessed, Steinberg MR816 comes with a total of only 16 channels. However, the model comes with a special feature. It comes with quick connect buttons that allow you to easily route tracks and channels. You simply need to select a Cubase track, then you hit the button of the channel that you want from the device. It is then automatically routed. Such control mechanism is very intuitive and convenient. However, Steinberg MR816 does not have the VST version of the DSP plug-ins. It also does not come with some FX features like Rev-X and Sweet Spot Morphing Channel Strip.
On the other hand, Steinberg UR824 offers a total of 24 channels available with direct monitoring. The models come with the VST version of the DSP plug-ins, as well as special FX features like Rev-X, Sweet Spot Morphing Channel Strip, and dspMixFx. On the downside, Steinberg UR824 does not provide the quick connect control.
In terms of performance, both Steinberg UR824 and Steinberg MR816 actually have stellar performance levels. They capture, record, and deliver high-quality audio, thanks to the premium Class-A D-PRE mic preamps and powerful engines. Each of the two models comes with 8 mic preamps that all support +48V phantom power. Steinberg Ur824 and Steinberg MR816 also have the maximum output quality of 24-bit/192kHz.
However, Steinberg MR816 actually has lower latency levels than Steinberg UR824. Given the same buffer size, Steinberg MR816 can work with lower latency than Steinberg UR824. So, the performance of Steinberg MR816 is slightly better.
Steinberg UR824 Vs MR816
|Steinberg UR824||Steinberg MR816|
|Key features||- Analog 8 in and 8 out with 8 D-Pre Class-A mic preamps supporting +48 V
- 2 pairs of ADAT optical I/O (doubles as S/PDIF) provide 16 in and 16 out (S/MUX compatible, 8 in and 8 out @ 96 kHz)
- Latency-free DSP-powered monitoring with one REV-X reverb and 8 Channel Strips with any DAW by using the latest dspMixFx technology
- 24-bit/192 kHz support & JetPLL||- True Integrated Monitoring: no latency and dynamic 1:1 hardware/software mirroring
- Complete Cubase user interface integration throughout
- Eight discrete Class A analogue "D-Pre" mic preamps with combination XLR and TRS analog inputs, advanced new inverted Darlington circuits, gain control and phantom power
- Quick Connect: next-generation of plug and play|
|Customer ratings*||4.2 out of 5.0 stars||4.2 out of 5.0 stars|
|Best deal*||Save Money Please click here||Save Money Please click here|
NOTE : Product prices, availability, ratings and save money information are accurate as of the date/time indicated on post time (as seen right bellow the tittle) and are subject to change. Any price, ratings, availability and save money information displayed on Amazon Site at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
Both models are excellent products. In general, you may prefer Steinberg UR824 because of the extra ports and VST. However, if 16 channels are sufficient for you and you don’t need the VST, you can choose Steinberg MR816. The quick control is very convenient to use, and the performance is slightly better.